University Grant Commission has done new amendments in UGC – NET Paper June 2010 by publishing latest notification in PDF file. According to UGC Notification, the candidates will see changed form of paper III in UGC NET Exam. June 2010. Last year UGC had amended UGC – NET papers by introducing the provision of deduction for wrong answer in objective type questions. This is third amendment in UGC NET Examination.
Understand these changes:-
1. Now, you have to write two essay type questions’ answer instead of one big essay type question.
2. Now, Numbers of analytical question has been decreased from 5 to 3. Marks of per question have been increased from 12 to 15.
3. Now, number of definitional questions has been decreased from 15 to 9. Marks of per question have been increased from 5 to 10.
My Views on these Amendments
Understand these changes:-
1. Now, you have to write two essay type questions’ answer instead of one big essay type question.
2. Now, Numbers of analytical question has been decreased from 5 to 3. Marks of per question have been increased from 12 to 15.
3. Now, number of definitional questions has been decreased from 15 to 9. Marks of per question have been increased from 5 to 10.
My Views on these Amendments
I think, UGC NET should be the test of knowledge. But it has just become test of memory which is so bad according to my view. If University Grant Commission wants to promote great teachers in India, then there will not enough just by doing new amendments for making tough UGC NET. It is need of time that UGC should give UGC NET certificate to those4. Who can motivate the students.
1. Who can teach in classroom with best way.
2. Who can understand the problems of students.
3. Who can teach interesting way.
It is my experience of more than two years after working with Google that students of India need best teachers who can understand them and solve their problems. India needs not the lecturers, teachers and professors who have cleared UGC NET examination by just cramming because they will failure to solve latest and practical problems of students.
HI.. I think what you are saying is absolutely correct..
ReplyDeleteI have appeared for NET once and chose marketing as the area of specialisation (under management). I just got 35% marks in the III paper despite being the topper of marketing in my college. That just shows UGC is looking at crammed answers and wants people to vomit it out on the paper and is not looking for practical/application based answers.. it's time they should change their attitude!
No there is another important reason especially when this is adapted for University Examination for admission to PH.D (new regulation 2009) , because of subjective nature of the quaestion, it will be upto the sweet will of the examiner to give/not to give marks under essay writing! may help his/her candidates!!
ReplyDeleteThe way of testing is not good as a very large chunk of people are not able to clear it inspite of having great knowledge but lacking ability to cram
ReplyDeletehi this is radhika.
ReplyDeletei think this is the worst ammendment from 2010 ..no need to to this amendment.its very lengthy process of paper 3.last amendment was best than this.this is just the foolishness..m not at all happy eith this .